|
|
| (26) Sic igitur patet per veram demonstrationem hoc, quod aqua non est ecentrica; quod erat primum consequentis principalis consequentie quod destrui debebatur. | (26) Wherefore it follows, from the true demonstration (derived from the character of the bodies concerned) whereby I have shown that this is not so, that water is not excentric; and this was the first [member] which we had to refute of the consequent of the main sequence. |