Commentary Par XXXIII 130-132

See Dronke (Dron.1965.1), pp. 389-90, and Baranski (Bara.2000.1), pp. 173-74, 217, both cited by Gilson (Gils.2004.1), p. 174n., as synthesizing Platonism and Aristotelianism.  And see Ryan (Ryan.1993.1), p. 136, for the point (which he presents as being more than a quibble) that the final vision in the poem is not one of the Trinity (the usual understanding) but of the humanity of Jesus.  Ryan is correct that this is not a quibble; however, he is probably not correct about the nature of the vision.  The final vision is of the Trinity, which includes Jesus -- in both His natures.  See the C.Par.XXXIII.124-126.